UNIVERSIDADE LUSÍADA DE LISBOA

Use este link para passar a navegação e ir para o conteúdo da página

Licenciatura em Psicologia - Disciplina - Ano lectivo 2005/2006

Para voltar para a navegação utilize este link

Nome da Disciplina

Ergonomia e Engenharia Humana

Docente

Prof. Doutor Pedro Zany Caldeira

Ano do Curso

1.º ano

Nível da Disciplina

-

Código da Disciplina

20048

Disciplina Semestral / Anual

Semestral

Disciplina Obrigatória / Opcional

Obrigatória

Tipo

Teórico-Práticas

Número de horas / semana

2 horas

Regime

Diurno

Pré-Requisitos

Nenhuns

Língua de Instrução

Português

Créditos ECTS

4

topo

OBJECTIVOS

-

topo

PROGRAMA

Programa [pdf ]

topo

METODOLOGIA

-

topo

AVALIAÇÃO

Frequência (100%) ou Exame (100%)

topo

BIBLIOGRAFIA

  • Caldeira, P. (1994). Os Computadores (Não) Têm Sempre Razão. Análise Psicológica, Série XII, 1, 117-128.
  • Caldeira, P. (1996). Modelos Mentais do Estratega. In Carlos A. Marques & Cunha, M. P. (1996) Determinantes da Gestão e Relações com o Mercado (pp. 81-110). Lisboa: D. Quixote.
  • Caldeira, P. Z. (2000). Macroergonomia: novas tendências do desenvolvimento organizacional. In Suzana Braga Rodrigues & Miguel Pina e Cunha (Eds.), Estudos Organizacionais: Novas Perspectivas na Administração de Empresas (Uma colectânea Luso-Brasileira) (pp. 413-425). São Paulo: Iglu Editora.
  • Chapanis, A. (1991). Evaluating usability. In B. Shackel, & S. Richardson (Eds.), Human Factors in Informatics Usability (pp. 359-395). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chapanis, A. (1995). Ergonomics in product development. Ergonomics, 28, 8, 1625-1638.
  • Christol, J. & Mazeau, M. (1994). La pratique de l’ergonomie. Actes des XXIIIes Journées Nationales de Médecine du Travail, 274-281.
  • Christol, J. (1992). Diagnostic en ergonomia. Performances Humaines & Techniques, 58, 20-23.
  • Eason, K. D. (1980). Dialogue: design implications of task allocation between man and computer. Ergonomics, 23, 9, 881-891.
  • Eason, K. D. (1991). Ergonomic perspectives on advances in human-computer interaction. Ergonomics, 34, 6, 721-741.
  • Eason, K. (1996). Division of labour and design of systems for computer supported for cooperative work. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 1, 39-50.
  • Getty, R. L. (1989). The Macroergonomical Challenge of Industrial Teaming Arrangement’s Organizational Structure. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd annual meeting, 836-840.
  • Getty, R. L. (1993). The Integration of Ergonomics in a Safety Improvement Program: Design and Implementation of an Ergonomics Initiative. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 891-895.
  • Gilmore, D. J. & Millard, D. (1998). Integrating Micro and Macro-Ergonomics. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 964-968.
  • Hendrick, H. (1995). Future directions in macroergonomics. Ergonomics, 28, 8, 1617-1624.
  • Hendrick, H. W. (1997). Good Ergonomics is Good Economics. Ergonomics in Design, 5, 2, 1-15
  • Hendrick, H. W. & Kleiner, B. M. (Eds) (2002). Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Iida, I. (1990). Ergonomia. São Paulo: Editora Edgard Blücher Ltda.
  • Imada, A. S. & Bowman, M. E. (1992). Change by Design, Human Factors by Necessity: Lessons in Participatory Ergonomics. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 855-858.
  • Imada, A. S. & Hubert, R. J. (1993). Physical and Psychological Factors in Perceived Safety: A Macroergonomic Case Study. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37rd annual meeting Vol. 2, 901-904.
  • Johnson, G. I., Clegg, C. W. e Ravden, S.J. (1989). Towards a practical method of user interface evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 20, 4, 255-280.
  • Kapitaniak, B. (1994). L’analyse globale du travail. In G. Péninou (Ed.) Prévention et Ergonomie (pp. 39-49). Paris : Masson.
  • Leplat, J.; & Cluny, X. (1980). La psychologie ergonomique. Paris: PUF.
  • Luczak, H. (1995). Macroergonomic anticipatory evaluation of work organization in product systems. Ergonomics, 28, 8, 1571-1599.
  • McNeese, M. D., Zaff, B. S., Brown, C. E., Citera, M., & Wellens, A. R. (1992). The Role of a Group-Centered Approach in the Development of Computer-Supported Collaborative Design Technologies. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 867-871.
  • Montmollin, M. (1995). A Ergonomia. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.
  • Nagamachi, M. & Imada, A. S. (1992). A Macroergonomic Approach for Improving Safety and Work Design. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 859-861.
  • Oborne, D. J. (1991). Ergonomics at Work. Chichester: John Wiley.
  • Prista e Silva, J. (1987). Métodos ergonómicos de análise do trabalho. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública, 3-4, 61-66.
  • Robertson, M. M. (1991). Macroergonomic Tools and Strategies: An International Overview. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, Vol 2, 925-929.
  • Singleton, W. T. (1989). The mind at work: psychological ergonomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sperandio, J.-C. (1989). Contribuições contemporâneas da psicologia cognitiva e da inteligência artificial para a ergonomia da informática. Análise Psicológica, Série VII, nº 1,2 e 3, 231-243.
  • Wilpert, B. (1996). Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Ergonomics: Towards More Comprehensive Work Sciences. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 2, 85-93.
  • Wisner, A. (1981). Élements de méthodologie ergonomique. In Scherrer et col. (Eds), Précis de Physiologie du Travail (pp. 521-539). Paris: Mason.

topo